The War Against Global Warming

The fight against global warming is a full-scale war,warming. But this argument, too, is wearing thin, as
with two strong armies poised for battle on either side.more people realize that environmental pollution cannot
There are minor skirmishes and engagements, attackspossibly be good for the planet - it will definitely have
and counter-attacks, strategies and counter-strategies,harmful effects, most probably in the form of global
deceptions, victories and defeats. But above all, therewarming.
is the fog of war - a cloud of disinformation that helpsThe next defence -indeed a very successful one - is
both the armies.to steal the thunder from the opposition, by using their
On one side, there is a growing number of scientists,terminology. This gives the appearance of action when
engineers and climatologists. They are supported bythere is none, or very little. Thus every business uses
some media, many celebrities, some politicians,words like energy efficiency, or sustainability. Any new
laypersons and, surprisingly, quite a few civil servants.product or service that comes out is "green". We have
The latest and most powerful recruit is none othergreen power, green politics, green communities, and
than the new US president, Barrack Obama.green meetings.
Opposing them are the oil producers, automakers,Yet another tactic is simple diversion- moving the
processing industries, and other big businesses thatfocus away from the issues that matter to others that
want to preserve the status quo for as long as theyhave a lesser impact. Most of the environmental
can, to maintain their profitability. For simplicity, let us calldamage today is caused by air and water pollution
this group the global warmers. They have the money,from industrial sources, industrial wastes, emissions
power and some political influence. But right now, thefrom commercial vehicles, burning of fossil fuels,
global warmers are on the run, facing a majordepletion of natural resources, and energy
onslaught from the environmental groups, and theirconsumption in large buildings. But public attention is,
tactics are getting increasingly defensive.instead, directed towards voluntary energy savings,
Their first line of defence is to deny the very fact ofmostly at the individual level. We are encouraged to
global warming. Generously funded "think tanks"re-cycle more, use energy efficient light bulbs, use
produce reports that question the very accuracy ofrenewable energy, and generally reduce our
the statistical data that supports the notion of globalenvironmental footprint. All these things are important
warming. However, this position is getting lessbut it is doubtful how much impact they will have in the
defensible as signs of global warming are nowabsence of any real enforcement. Much more needs
unmistakable- the break-up of the polar ice caps, theto be done -- tightening up of regulations, more
melting of glaciers and the drying up of lakes andcommuter trains, less buses, and reduced dependence
rivers throughout the world.on fossil fuels. In addition, we need stronger incentive
The second line of defence is to deny that humanprograms to induce people to make better
beings are responsible for global warming. This again isenvironmental choices.
done in reports that question the science behind theIn the long run, the global warmers cannot prevail,
climate change models. They point out that differentbecause the consequences would be far too
computer models produce different results and there isdisastrous. But we need action right now, before
no absolute proof that human activity causes globalclimate change becomes irreversible.